Thursday, March 31, 2011

Iran And The 12th Imam - Behind The Veil Of The Middle East Revolution

The 12th Imam
It doesn't matter if you believe it or not. The leaders of the Iranian regime believe it. They believe the sole purpose of Iran's existence is to prepare the way for the 12th Imam, also known as the Mahdi. In the process of accomplishing this, they believe that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the general who will lead the armies of Islam in the destruction of Israel, the final act before the return of the Mahdi. Crazy? That's not important. Hitler was crazy too, and look what he accomplished before being defeated.

Yeah, I know, it's all about democracy in the Middle East. Hillary, Barack, and the rest of the left wing arm of our government will try to sell us this. Even they don't understand the dangers coming when "democracy" arises in Egypt, Libya, and elsewhere. The real story will be when the various dictators and rulers are removed. Then a new agenda will arise from the well-organized fundamentalist groups seeded throughout the region who are supported, funded, armed, and often led in the field by the Iranians.

In Iraq, the country in which we established the first real democracy in the Middle East, the Mahdi Army, led by fanatical cleric Muqtada al Sadr, is the arm of the Iranians. Al Sadr has spent many of the last few years going back and forth from Iran to Iraq, learning from the Iranians and waiting in the shadows for his moment. Remember that Babylon is very important to the Islamic last days.

In Lebanon, the Iranian-supported group is Hezbollah, led by Hassan Nasrallah. If the Syrian government falls, Hezbollah will try to move in to take advantage of the chaos.

In the Palestinian areas it is Hamas, a terrorist group funded and armed by the Iranians via Syria via Hezbollah.

Then there is Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Qatar, Bahrain, Yemen, and the ultimate Islamic prize, Saudi Arabia. The Muslim Brotherhood, whose spritual leader Shaykh Yusuf al Qaradawi has called for the destruction of Israel, has a presence in all these countries. Yes, Iran helps them too.

We have only begun to see the edges of the firestorm that will soon engulf the Middle East. In the end, the real ultimate prize is Israel. That tiny country must feel like it is treading water in a school of sharks.

Too bad Israel's former best friend, the United States, isn't providing them much moral support at such a critical time in their history.

Charles M. Grist
www.MyLastWar.com

NATO Takes Command In Libya - Alliance At Odds On Rebel Support


Even as Barack Obama tries to back away from operations in Libya, already there are major disagreements between the United States and NATO.

Don't forget that the United States bears much of the burden for the military and political leadership of NATO. Americans will be involved in some way in Libya from now on. We already have spies and special ops troops on the ground, and they will be there for some time.

The United States and Britain want to arm the rebels who lost ground again this week. However, NATO Chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen disagrees and says that NATO is there "to protect the Libyan people, not to arm the people."

Expect further fractures in the NATO alliance over Libya. If NATO pilots or troops are killed or captured at some point, many of these NATO "allies" will head for the exit.

Obama is now waist-deep in the quicksand of the Middle East. As I mentioned to my Facebook friends the other day, somewhere George W. Bush is sitting with his feet propped up in a recliner, his TV remote in one hand and an iced tea in the other. When he watches Obama tap dance in front of America, I can picture the ex-president quietly chuckling to himself....

Charles M. Grist
www.MyLastWar.com

Monday, March 28, 2011

Sleeping With The Enemy - America Supports Jihadists In Libya


Libyan Rebel Leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi
 It's not surprising that Barack Obama's "kinetic military action" in Libya has put America in bed with its enemies. The man simply doesn't know what he's doing when it comes to international affairs. There are very few good guys in Libya - on either side. There is no George Washington or Thomas Jefferson.

The same can be said for Egypt, Yemen, Syria, Jordan, Bahrain, or Saudi Arabia. We've been supporting some of these kings or dictators so we can buy their oil or get their support in the war on terror. Now that their citizens are rising up, are there any good guys anywhere in the Arab world?

The following article from the Washington Examiner reveals that we are providing air and logistical support for some of the very same people who have waged war against us in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The biggest crime in Libya is involving American troops in a war that puts them on the same side as those who have tried to kill them. This is intolerable, and Barack Obama should be impeached for it.

Unfortunately, that won't happen in a Progressive Washington, D.C......

*  *  *  *

Jihadis who fought U.S. in Iraq, Afghanistan now enjoy American support in Libya

By Byron York
Washington Examiner
March 26, 2011

Evidence is emerging that United States forces are waging war in Libya on behalf of rebels whose ranks include jihadis who fought against the U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Britain's Daily Telegraph reports that Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, a leader of U.S.-supported rebel forces in the fighting around Adjabiya, went to Afghanistan in 2002 to fight against the "foreign invasion" -- that is, U.S. troops who invaded Afghanistan in retaliation for the September 11 attacks. The Telegraph says al-Hasidi told an Italian newspaper, Il Sole 24 Ore, that he was captured in 2002 in Peshawar, Pakistan. "He was later handed over to the U.S., and then held in Libya before being released in 2008," the Telegraph reports. Al-Hasidi also told the Italian paper he recruited about 25 Libyan men to fight against U.S. forces in Iraq.

Al-Hasidi's story is consistent with evidence presented in a 2007 report published by the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point. That report, by professors Joseph Felter and Brian Fishman, examined records of an al Qaeda-affiliated organization found after an October 2007 raid near Sinjar, Iraq. The records contained biographical information about nearly 700 foreign terrorists who came to Iraq to fight against the United States between August 2006 and August 2007.

Felter and Fishman found that the largest portion of foreign fighters, about 41 percent, came to Iraq from Saudi Arabia. The second-largest source of foreign fighters, at nearly 19 percent, was Libya. "Libya contributed far more fighters per capita than any other nationality in the Sinjar records, including Saudi Arabia," the authors conclude. Since previous studies had indicated far fewer Libyan fighters in Iraq, the authors suggest there may have been a "surge" of Libyans into Iraq in the spring and summer of 2007. "The apparent surge in Libyan recruits traveling to Iraq may be linked to the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group's [LIFG] increasingly cooperative relationship with al Qaeda, which culminated in the LIFG official joining al Qaeda on November 3, 2007," the report say.

The Telegraph, citing U.S. and British government sources, reports that Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi was a member of the LIFG.

The Combating Terrorism Center reports says that Darnah, Libya -- al-Hasidi's hometown-- supplied more foreign fighters to Iraq than any other city, including Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, a city far larger than Darnah. Benghazi, Libya, now a rebel stronghold, was also a major source of Libyan fighters traveling to Iraq. "Both Darnah and Benghazi have long been associated with Islamic militancy in Libya, in particular for an uprising by Islamist organizations in the mid-1990s," the authors report. "The Libyan government blamed the uprising on 'infiltrators from the Sudan and Egypt' and one group -- the Libyan Fighting Group -- claimed to have Afghan veterans in its ranks. The Libyan uprisings became extraordinarily violent. [Libyan strongman Moammar] Gadhafi used helicopter gunships in Benghazi, cut telephone, electricity, and water supplies to Darnah and famously claimed that the militants "deserve to die without trial, like dogs." In the current fighting, Gadhafi has said that the rebels fighting against him are affiliated with al Qaeda, but his claims have found little acceptance.

There is no doubt that the rebels associated with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group are violent extremists. The Combating Terrorism Center Report found that the Libyans, along with Moroccans, were more likely than others to become suicide bombers once they were in Iraq. The Sinjar records, plus political developments in the 2007 time period, "suggest that Libyan factions (primarily the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group) are increasingly important in al Qaeda," the report says.

Now, it is not clear what portion of the Libyan rebels, who enjoy the backing and assistance of the United States military, have been associated with al Qaeda and attacks on the U.S. in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. That's one reason critics of the Libya war say the U.S.-led coalition doesn't really know who it's fighting for. But we may learn more in the future, especially if the rebels prevail and some former jihadis find themselves running Libya, courtesy of the United States.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/03/jihadis-who-fought-us-iraq-afghanistan-now-enjoy-american-support#ixzz1Hw55wwGj

*  *  *  *

 According to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Libya does not pose a threat to the United States, nor is it "a vital national interest to the United States." If that is the case, then America had no business involving itself in a civil war.

We are in trouble, America....

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Sunday, March 27, 2011

British Medic Among Those Awarded Medals For Heroism in Afghanistan

L/Cpl Kylie Watson
The article below describes the heroism of Lance Corporal Kylie Watson and Royal Marine Mark Jackson, both of whom were awarded medals for heroism in Afghanistan. I was honored to serve with soldiers from the United Kingdom during my tour in Iraq in 2004. They are an extraordinary group of warriors.

*  *  *  *

Courageous Army medic awarded Military Cross

By Brian Brady, Whitehall Editor
Sunday, 27 March 2011

An Army medic who put herself in "mortal danger" to treat a wounded Afghan soldier under heavy Taliban fire has been awarded the Military Cross, Britain's third-highest medal for gallantry.

Lance Corporal Kylie Watson, who gave the casualty medical care in exposed open ground for 20 minutes before getting him to a helicopter, is one of more than 130 servicemen and women commended for bravery in the latest military honours list.

The medic, who also made a 100-yard dash through enemy fire to help another Afghan soldier, was praised for her "immense courage [and] willingness to put her own life at risk".

L/Cpl Watson, of the Royal Army Medical Corps, stemmed the soldier's bleeding despite being hampered by other Afghan troops, and got the injured man to a helicopter landing site 200 yards away.

The incidents were a vivid illustration of the pressures faced by medical personnel on the front line of the battle against the Taliban. Nine months ago, L/Cpl Watson herself gave a graphic account of the casualties she had to deal with, in an interview with The Independent.

"The first time a bullet went through the side of this guy's face and exited on the other side," she said, during Operation Black Prince, which targeted insurgents in Helmand province. "He suffered some injuries to his jaw but nothing more serious. A little later a guy who was standing on a sangar [watchtower] got shot in the arm."

L/Cpl Watson's MC was awarded for her actions during the same tour, when she risked her life under enemy fire to help the Afghan soldiers. In the second rescue, she delivered life-saving first aid to a soldier who had been shot twice in the pelvis.

Her citation said: "Watson's immense courage, willingness to put her own life at risk and absolute bravery saved the life of one warrior and acted as an inspiration to her platoon and their Afghan National Army partners."

Other servicemen honoured include Royal Marine Mark Jackson, awarded the Conspicuous Gallantry Cross after picking up and throwing back an enemy grenade before lying on a comrade to shield him from the blast.

Marine Jackson was on look-out duty at a remote patrol base in Helmand province on 24 August last year when he heard a metallic thud and saw a cylindrical object rolling towards the feet of a fellow sentry.

Immediately realising it was a home-made hand grenade, he grabbed it and threw it back – at the same time leaping on his comrade to protect him.

His medal citation said: "Improvised grenades such as these are notoriously volatile and this one could have detonated at any moment. Jackson was well aware of the risk, his only thought was for the life of his comrade who, had he hesitated for one moment, would have been killed."

The awards were announced as the Ministry of Defence (MoD) revealed British troops working with Afghan police had chased insurgent fighters out of an area of Helmand and destroying a huge cache of their weapons. The MoD said Popalzai Kalay had been cleared by soldiers from the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders, 5th Battalion the Royal Regiment of Scotland, together with Afghan police. The aim was to pre-empt an anticipated spring offensive by insurgent fighters in the area.

*  *  *  *

We are indeed fortunate to have allies like those in the United Kingdom.

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Violent Protests Rock Syria And Yemen - Will The UN Intervene Again?

Protests in Yemen
Now that the United Nations - with the United States in the lead - has commenced "kinetic military action" in Libya, who's next? We allegedly entered that civil war to protect civilians, so what happens when civilians are being murdered elsewhere in the Middle East?

Syrian troops are killing protestors in that county. The terrorist group Hezbollah may enter the fray, seeking to further cement their influence. In Yemen, more than forty civilians were killed by government snipers last week. Islamic fundamentalists in that country will try to take advantage of the unrest. Are these countries next on the list for United Nations intervention?

Yemen is more important to the United States than Libya. It is a hotbed for Al Qaeda and other fundamentalist groups in the region. The government has been a partner in anti-terrorist activity. Do we support the government or the protestors?

Syria, the country north of Israel, has already been influenced by Hezbollah, Iran's terrorist proxy. Iran has put up with the Syrian leadership for the time being, but they may be getting impatient. We have never supported the Syrian leader, President Bashar Assad, who is admired by Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. Should we encourage the United Nations to intervene in Syria to protect the citizens who are being murdered?

Of course not. We may have interests in the region, but we cannot afford to let our military become involved in multiple civil wars in the Middle East. We should never have entered the civil war in Libya, but now we have been sucked into the vortex of that war. It's endgame is unclear, and the struggle by the rebels could go on for years if the Libyan leader remains in power.

The questions about Syria, Yemen, and other countries simply show that the Obama administration does not have a logical reasoning process when it comes to military action. No clear mission, no endgame, afraid to call it war, and a president who doesn't really want to face reporters who just might ask some embarrassing questions.

Whether we intervene or not, the history of the Middle East will be written by the Arabs, not by the West. Therefore the best decision is to mind our own business. It's one thing to offer training and equipment to groups who have proven their loyalty and determination to fight for their own freedom. We must avoid, at all costs, the temptation to do it for them.

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Saturday, March 26, 2011

World War II Veterans Meet 67 Years After Serving Together

U.S.S. Ticonderoga in World War II
Two World War II veterans, both who served on the U.S.S. Ticonderoga during the war, recently reunited by chance in a doctor's office in Leesburg, Florida. Ed Watkins, 86, and Larry Ashman, 87, had actually served in the same section on the ship during attacks by the Japanese.

On this particular day, Ed wore his "Ticonderoga" hat to the doctor's office where he was spotted by Larry's wife. Larry had accompanied his wife to the doctor, so the reunion then took place. Both men were flabbergasted that they had found a shipmate of their generation.

Here is a link to a news story done by Central Florida's Channel 13:

http://www.cfnews13.com/video?clip=http://static.cfnews13.com/newsvideo/cfn/ww2-vets-0325.flv

I must tell you that Ed is my father-in-law. I recently purchased the hat at the VA clinic in Orlando and presented it to him. Now I'm really glad I thought to do so.

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Friday, March 25, 2011

NATO Insists America Keep A Combat Role in Libya - We're Stuck For Now

Our new "pals"; O.K. guys, who's Al Qaeda, who's the Muslim Brotherhood, and who's Thomas Jefferson?
NATO has taken over leadership of the Libyan War (sorry, Libyan Kinetic Military Action), but insists that the United States maintain a combat role. Well now, isn't that surprising?

I received some emails after my last post, concerned that I said we had to "win" now in Libya because leaving Muammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi in charge would open us up to decades of attacks by Libyan terrorists seeking revenge for this conflict. Perhaps I need to re-define "win."

To justify the risking of our troop's lives, there must be an endgame, an exit strategy, a purpose for their sacrifice. The only one that makes sense is to remove Gaddafi - who has committed terrorist acts against America in the past - and his leadership. We never should have becomed involved in this civil war, but we can't leave him in charge now that we have attacked him.

But once that happens, we should wave goodbye to Libya and hit the door. We simply cannot become involved in "nation building" again. Advise the good guys (if there are any), give them copies of our Constitution, sell them humanitarian aid (they can afford it), and buy their damned oil if they'll sell it to us.

Then, as our ships sail home, remind the new leaders that if anyone attacks us, we will turn whoever is responsible into dust....

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Thursday, March 24, 2011

The Tentacles of War - Now We Have To Win In Libya

Muammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi
As these words are written, young Americans are once again at war. Yes, regardless of the Obama administration's efforts to call it anything but war, it is indeed war. Bombs are dropping, bullets and rockets are being fired, and people are dying. Sorry, Barry and Hil - it's war...

While the left and the right throw darts at each other, our troops (Navy and Air Force for now) are at risk, not worried about the politics of the situation, but concentrating on taking care of each other - a task they do very well. We must not forget to keep them in our prayers, hoping that the day of their return is soon.

The awful tentacles of war are beginning to grasp America's legs, threatening to drag us into the depths of a desert war without any idea of how it will end. Go ahead, President Barry, turn it over to NATO, but when it goes south and the countries in the coalition begin to falter, whine, and withdraw, who do you think will have to come back to fix the mess?

That's right, good old America will be the hero who is expected to save the day, the nation everyone turns to when they don't have the guts to fix a problem. Unfortunately, America's current leadership may not have the guts to take over again if the situation in Libya becomes dire. If Gaddafi retains power, the no-fly zone doesn't stop him from murdering his citizens, and other countries start taking their toys and heading home, what happens then?

Now that we have entered the fray, however foolishly, we cannot simply put our tail between our legs and go home. If NATO can't finish the job - meaning taking out Gaddafi - then we will have to do it. To leave him there now will only embolden him and Al Qaeda. If the job isn't finished successfully, Gaddafi will spend the rest of his life sending terrorists all over the world. His payback will be our hell.

The Obama administration has made its biggest blunder by getting us involved in the Libyan civil war. Obama is actually beginning to make Jimmy Carter appear competent.

If there is a light at the end of this bloody tunnel, it's the real possibility that the war in Libya may ensure that Barack Obama doesn't get a second term.

At this point, I'm willing to grab at any potential good news....

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Western Coalition Fractures In Libya; Obama Leads America To The Edge Of A Cliff

Germany withdraws from the Coalition, Norway turns its jets around before they reach Libya, the Arab League waffles in its support, intelligence indicates that many of the rebels are probably supporters of Al Qaeda, NATO support begins to vanish, and America loses its first thirty million dollar aircraft in the Libyan desert. What else can go wrong? Plenty.

If Colonel Muammar Gaddafi retains power, a no-fly zone could last for years. There are already reports of Gaddafi's troops terrorizing civilians in Libyan cities and towns. Nothing short of boots on the ground will prevent that from continuing.

If Gaddafi loses power, what will replace him? The awful task of "nation-building" will be thrust upon the Western powers who entered this civil war. Once we are involved in creating another "democracy," we and our allies will find ourselves mired down in another Islamic fundamentalist insurgency.

Obama says he will turn the conflict over to other nations in a few days. Since it appears NATO wants nothing to do with it, some in the administration have suggested a "steering committee" to manage the no-fly zone. Isn't a steering committee something you use to plan the local school carnival? Who had that stupid idea?

Obama's Libyan adventure will surely go down in history as one of the biggest blunders made by any president. He may try to give this mess to England and France in a few days, but that will not remove our fingerprints from the disaster - or eliminate our responsibility to help fix what is broken later.

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

F15 Crashes In Libya; Crew Rescued

The first American aircraft goes down on the poorly chosen battlefield of Libya. This is not a good war, not the right war, and we are fortunate this time to rescue the pilots. We may not be so lucky the next time.

There is nothing in Libya worth risking the life of one single American warrior. They will do their jobs as ordered - as we all have, but we should not be involved in this civil war.

The following article is from the Associated Press:

*  *  *  *

U.S. Military Plane Crashes in Libya; 2 Crew Members Eject

David Rising
Associated Press 

BERLIN -- A U.S. fighter jet crashed in Libya after an apparent equipment malfunction but both crewmembers were able to eject and are back safely in American hands, U.S. officials said Tuesday.
 
The plane crashed Monday at 2130 GMT (5:30 p.m. EDT), said Vince Crawley, a spokesman for U.S. Africa Command.

A spokesman for the Libyan opposition, Mohammed Ali, said the U.S. plane crashed about 25 miles (40 kilometers) southwest of the eastern rebel stronghold of Benghazi, Libya's second-largest city.

A Marine Corps Osprey search and rescue aircraft retrieved the pilot, while the second crew member, a weapon's officer, was recovered by rebel forces and is now in American hands, another U.S. official said in Washington. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record.

The two were separated after ejecting from the crippled F-15E Strike Eagle jet at high altitude and drifting down to different locations, Crawley said, adding they sustained minor injuries.
 
The aircraft, based out of Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, was flying out of Italy's Aviano Air Base in support of Operation Odyssey Dawn. The cause of the crash is being investigated.

The Air Force has said only that B-2, F-15 and F-16 fighters are participating in operations over Libya. The U.S. involvement in Libya is being run by Africa Command, which is based in Stuttgart, Germany.

Africa Command launched in Oct. 2008 after the Pentagon abandoned efforts to base the command on the continent after it hit resistance among African nations, and instead posted about two dozen liaison officers at African embassies.

Pauline Jelinek in Washington, Cassandra Vinograd in London and Maggie Michael in Cairo contributed to this report.

*  *  *  *

Thanks to the Associated Press for this report.

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Monday, March 21, 2011

Obama Ignores the Constitution To Wage War In Libya

Barack Obama has started America's third war in a Muslim country in the Middle East. He has done so by consulting only the Security Council of the United Nations. Why did he ignore Congress, the only Constitutional authority that can declare war? It is wrong if a Republican president does it; it is equally wrong now.

Obama's march toward one world government continues. His goal is to diminish the Constitution, to reduce the effectiveness of Congress, and to ensure that he alone decides what is best for America. That, my friends, is the definition of a dictator, even as "The One" enjoys a side trip with his family to South America.

Confusion also reigns as the bombs drop in Libya. The president says Moammar Gadhafi must go; the Pentagon says that removing Gadhafi is NOT a goal of the operation. We still don't know who these rebels are, but we're helping them anyway.

For the record, if victory and regime change ARE the goals, then such a victory will not happen with air power alone. Someone will have to put boots on the ground. Objectives, cities, hills, and nations are not captured until they are occupied. The rag-tag rebels in Libya are too disjointed to accomplish such tasks.

Now that the bombs are falling and the casualties are mounting on the ground, Gadhafi will make the issue the fact that the Western "Crusaders" are at it again. Already our Arab "allies" in this effort are getting cold feet.

If there is an endgame, which I seriously doubt, a regime change will mark the beginning of an Islamic fundamentalist insurgency. If there are still Westerners on the ground, they will become the issue, and we will find ourselves mired once more in the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time.

This may very well become Obama's biggest blunder. When a Democrat like Representative Dennis Kucinich mumbles the word "impeachment", you know that the president has really screwed up this time.

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Sunday, March 20, 2011

The Libyan Civil War: Why Are We Involved?

Libyan rebels
In my 2009 book, My Last War: A Vietnam Veteran's Tour in Iraq, I discussed the decision-making process that leads us to war.

It is my opinion that America must never commit it's troops to war unless (1) there is a real and imminent danger to the United States or to nations protected by mutual defense agreements with the U.S., (2) every option other than war has been exhausted, (3) our intelligence is accurate and complete, (4) our military and civilian leaders understand the political, religious, cultural and historic facts about the potential battlefield, and (5) finally, the war's endgame is precisely defined in terms of victory.

Is there an imminent danger to our nation or to nations with whom we have mutual defense agreements? I don't think so. This is a civil war, pure and simple. Who are the rebels? Are they simply freedom-loving patriots who sleep with Thomas Jefferson's biography under their pillows? Are they proxies for Iran who will be worse than the government they replace? No one seems to know who these guys are or to whom they hold allegiance.

If the effort is to protect innocent civilians from a brutal dictatorship, why don't we oppose the Saudi dictators who are just as cruel? Why do we stand by while Iran tortures and imprisons those who oppose its government? Why do we continue to defer to China whose terrible dictators have murdered tens of millions of its own people? Why is the situation in Libya different from other dictatorships around the world?

Has every other option been exhausted? What about letting the Libyan people solve their own problems? Wasn't involving ourselves in a civil war the primary criticism of the Vietnam War?

Is our intelligence about the Libyan situation and the rebels forces accurate and complete? Do our political and military leaders really understand all the political, religious, cultural and historic facts about this new battlefield and the rebels we support? I fear not.

Finally, what is the endgame? From all reports so far, the only endgame is to obtain a ceasefire and build some invisible wall between the two sides.  That's not enough to justify going to war. What will constitute victory? Regime change? The creation of a "demilitarized zone" like the ones that worked so well in Vietnam and Korea? If there is regime change, what will replace the dictatorship of Moammar Gadhafi - another one?

I am not convinced that we should be involved in another war in the Middle East - especially another "limited war". I call these types of wars "half-wars". These are the conflicts that always seem to get us bogged down, cost us the precious lives of our children and billions of our hard-earned dollars, and anchor our nation to another wave-tossed reef.

Unless there are facts yet to be revealed that justify this war, I shall remain convinced that our involvement in the conflict in Libya is a mistake.

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Gift of Painting Melts An Old Warrior

Author Grist with Ashley Lauren
During my tour in Iraq in 2004, my team was honored to meet and escort Doug Besherse who had come to Baghdad as a correspondent.

After my return from overseas, his then fourteen-year-old daughter, Ashley, contacted me periodically with questions about the military. She and her family have been ardent supporters of American troops.

Little did I know that Ashley, who has since become the well-known artist Ashley Lauren, had created a painting of me based on a letter I had written to President Bush that was published in the Orlando Sentinel. That letter had been in response to a critical letter to the president.

Ashley's painting "Dear Mr. President" depicts me in Vietnam as well as Iraq. The reflection from behind the Vietnam wall is me as a young lieutenant. Touching the wall with the letter is me as an old sergeant in Iraq.

I had not known about the painting which apparently was completed four years ago. When Doug, Ashley, and the rest of their family came to Orlando on vacation, my wife Debbie and I met them for dinner. I was flabbergasted when Ashley presented me with the painting.

Needless to say, receiving such an extraordinary gift was a humbling experience. To receive it personally from its gifted artist gave this old soldier a lump in his throat. It is indeed an honor to have such friends. I shall be forever grateful.

I hope you will visit Ashleys website at http://www.ashleylaurendesigns.com/. Her paintings are breathtaking.

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Disaster Plan: Are You Ready?

Stratfor is known for its accurate international political and military forecasting. This article talks about the need for a personal disaster plan for your family.

Remember that you must always plan for the worst case scenario. If nothing happens, then at least you were ready. But if you fail to prepare and something happens, then you have failed your family and yourself by pretending that disaster could never happen to you.

*  *  *  *

Taming Chaos with a Personal Plan

March 16, 2011
1805 GMT

By Scott Stewart

Over the past week we’ve seen a massive earthquake and tsunami in Japan that caused a nuclear accident, the Saudis sending troops into Bahrain to quell civil unrest there and the government of Yemen taking measures to expel foreign media as protests have swelled against Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh.

We have also recently seen large-scale evacuations of expatriates from Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, and it is not unreasonable to assume that we might see a similar exodus from Bahrain and Yemen if developments in those countries deteriorate. Moreover, in Japan, the risk of radiation and conditions that are not yet under control at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant could force further evacuations there.

In light of this uncertain environment, STRATFOR thought it prudent to address once again the topic of personal contingency planning. Indeed, we also made this topic the subject of this week’s Above the Tearline video. While we have often discussed this topic in relation to terrorist attacks, its principles are also readily applicable to crises caused by natural disaster, war and civil unrest. When a crisis erupts, having an established personal contingency plan provides people with a head start and a set of tools that can help them avoid, or at least mitigate, the effects of the chaos and panic that accompany crisis events.

When Chaos Reigns

When a crisis erupts due to civil unrest, natural disaster or a major terrorist attack, a number of things happen rapidly and sometimes simultaneously. First, panic ensues as people attempt to flee the immediate scene of the disaster, usually seeking safety using the same escape routes. At the same time, police, fire and emergency medical units all attempt to respond to the scene, so there can be terrible traffic and pedestrian crowd-control problems. In the event of large civil disturbances, roads can also be clogged with protesters, troops and panicked civilians. This can be magnified by smoke and fire, which can reduce visibility, affect breathing and increase panic.

In many instances, an attack or natural disaster will cause damage to electrical lines, or the electricity will be cut off as a precautionary measure. Natural gas, water and sewer lines can be damaged, causing leaks, and in the case of natural gas lines raising the threat of explosions and fire. Earthquakes and mudslides can cut roads and shut down mass transit. Often, people find themselves trapped in subway tunnels or in high-rise buildings, and they are sometimes forced to escape through smoke-filled tunnels or stairwells. Depending on the incident, bridges, tunnels, subway lines and airports can be closed or jammed to a standstill. Grocery stores are frequently inundated by people scrambling (and sometimes fighting) to obtain food and supplies.

In the midst of this confusion and panic, telephone and cell-phone usage soars. Even if the main trunk lines and cell towers are not damaged by the event or otherwise affected by the loss of electricity, this huge spike in activity quickly overloads the exchanges and cell networks. This means the ripples of chaos and disruption roll outward from the scene of the crisis as people outside the immediate vicinity of the crisis zone hear about the situation via the media and wonder what has become of loved ones who were in or near the crisis zone.

The Need to Plan

Those caught in close proximity to such a disaster site have the best chance of escaping and reconnecting with loved ones if they have a personal contingency plan. While such planning is critically important for people who live and work overseas in high-threat locations, recent events have demonstrated that even people residing in places considered safe, like Cairo and Tokyo, can be caught in the vortex of a crisis. Taking this one step farther, sudden disasters, such as tornadoes, earthquakes, school shootings or the derailment of train cars carrying chlorine, can strike almost anywhere. This means that everyone should have a personal contingency plan.

Emergency plans are vital not only for corporations and for schools but also for families and individuals. Such plans should be in place for each regular location — home, work and school — that an individual frequents and should cover what that person will do and where he or she will go should an evacuation be necessary. This means establishing meeting points for family members who might be split up — and backup points in case the first or second point also is affected by the disaster.

When school-aged children are involved, parents need to take the time to coordinate with the school to learn what the school’s crisis plans are so any measures the school employs can be accounted for during the planning process. A crisis plan should also account for any pets a family may have.

The lack of ability to communicate with loved ones because of circuit overload or other phone-service problems can greatly enhance the sense of panic during a crisis — especially in this age, when people are so dependent on almost-constant communications via the ubiquitous smart phone. Perhaps one of the foremost benefits of having personal and family contingency plans in place is the reduction of stress that results from not being able to contact a loved one immediately. Knowing that everyone is following the plan frees each person to concentrate on the more pressing challenges presented by their personal evacuation. This is critical because someone who waits until he or she has contacted all loved ones before evacuating might not make it out.

It also is important to have a communications plan, which should include the contact information for the designated rallying site as well as an alternate communications hub outside of the area. It might be difficult to communicate from point A to point B, but someone at point A or B might be able to get through to a person at point C. For example, it may be impossible to call from Tripoli to New York, but both parties may be able to call through to Rome.

Alternative means of communication also should be included in the communications plan. If the phone lines and cell phones are clogged, many times text messages can still get through and Internet connections may work to send e-mail. Satellite telephones, though expensive, are also very useful in a communications blackout, as are two-way radios. Analog fax lines can also prove useful when other forms of communication are shut down.

People who are going to serve as communications hubs need to be briefed on the evacuation plan and have contact information (landline and cell phone numbers, e-mail addresses, etc.) for each person who will be participating in the evacuation. The communications hub should also be provided with important personal data on each person, including full name, date of birth, passport numbers, etc. The communications plan also will be helpful in case one member of the family is unable to evacuate immediately or finds it unwise to evacuate at all. In that case, he or she will know where the rest of the family is going and how to contact them once communications are restored.

Planning is important because, when confronted with a dire situation, many people simply do not know what to do or where to start. It is not unusual to find people wandering aimlessly at the scene of a disaster. Not having determined their options in advance — and in state of shock over the events of the day — people quite often find themselves unable to think clearly enough to establish a logical plan, so they just drift around or collapse in helplessness. Having a plan in place gives even a person who is in shock or denial and unable to think clearly a framework to lean on and a path to follow.

Evacuating

One of the keys to surviving a catastrophe is situational awareness. Situational awareness allows people to recognizing a potential threat at an early stage and take measures to avoid it. Situational awareness also helps people know where to go when an unforeseen disaster strikes. For example, if the airport is closed by the crisis, situational awareness enables one to understand the alternate means of leaving the country, and if a bridge is damaged on an alternative land route, you can locate another way out. Being aware of the layouts of your residence and workplace is also critical. If an office building is hit by an incident of workplace violence or catches fire, people with a plan will know where the fire exits are and where they lead. Situational awareness will then help them realize when an exit could lead them out of the frying pan and into the fire.

Situational awareness also aids in reacting to a dangerous situation while on the move. If a subway tunnel is filling with smoke from a fire or bombing, situational awareness tells one to keep low in order to avoid being overcome by smoke. Better still, proper preparation can lead people to carry important items such as a smoke hood that can be worn to protect against smoke and a flashlight to help navigate a dark place like a tunnel.

For individuals who work in high-rise buildings, frequently travel or routinely take a commuter train or subway, these two items can greatly assist you if the need to evacuate arises. Smoke hoods are relatively inexpensive devices that can be carried in a briefcase or purse and quickly donned in case of emergency. They will usually provide around 20 to 30 minutes of breathing time, which could quite literally mean the difference between life and death in a smoke-filled hallway, stairway or subway tunnel. Likewise, a small flashlight could prove to be invaluable in a crisis situation at night or when the power goes out in a large building or subway. Some of the small aluminum flashlights can also double as a handy self-defense weapon.

Of course, in some situations, evacuation might not be the best idea. If there is no immediate threat at a specific location, it may be more dangerous to join a crowd of panicked people on the street. In some cases, it might be safest to just stay in place and wait for order to return — especially if the shelter is stocked with food, water and other basic necessities. Situational awareness will allow you to make the call on whether to stay or go.

As part of a contingency plan, it is also prudent to prepare a small “fly-away” kit containing clothes, water, a first-aid kit, nutritional bars, medications and toiletry items for each member of the family. It also is a good idea to include a battery-powered or crank-powered radio and other items such as appropriate maps, multi-tool knives and duct tape. An appropriate amount of cash can also prove quite useful. The kit should be kept in a convenient place, ready to grab on the way out. Even if it is impractical to keep all these items in constant readiness, keeping most of them together and using a prepared list to collect the other items quickly can help get one out the door in seconds. Maintaining important papers, such as vehicle titles, deeds, licenses, birth certificates, passports and credit card information, in a central file allows it to be quickly retrieved in case of an evacuation. Of course, passports are of vital importance in an overseas situation.

Another important part of situational awareness is having the means to receive instructions and information from the authorities. In addition to radio and television, many locations have emergency text and e-mail alert systems that can provide critical information. Overseas, embassies also maintain networks for disseminating information to expatriates such as the U.S. Department of State’s warden system. Individuals should register for such services and ensure they know how information is disseminated before the crisis hits and results in communication disruptions.

When it comes to information pertaining to emergency plans and fly-away kits, the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Administration’s ready.gov site is an excellent resource. For people residing overseas, the U.S. Department of State’s travel information site and the Overseas Security Advisory Council are also valuable resources filled with helpful information.

Now, while it is important to listen to authorities in the case of an emergency, individuals cannot rely on the government to take care of them in every situation because the resources simply may not be available. This means that individuals must have a plan in place designed to take care of themselves and their families.

Flexibility Required

In order to be effective, an emergency plan must be fluid and flexible. It is important to recognize that even a good plan can be worthless if reactive measures taken by authorities during an emergency impede execution of the plan, or if the catastrophe itself closes down the airport or a section of a primary escape route. For these reasons, it is best to have several alternate contingency plans that account for multiple scenarios and include various routes and modes of evacuation. Once the emergency is announced, it likely is too late to start devising a back-up plan.

Plans must be also reviewed periodically, at least once a year. A plan made following 9/11 might no longer be valid. Bridges and roads included in the original plan might be closed for construction at the present time or could have been changed to a one-way traffic pattern. Communication plans may also need to be updated if family members move or change telephone numbers.

The contents of fly-away kits should be checked periodically to ensure the kits are functional. Flashlight and radio batteries can lose their charge and need to be replaced. Items such as smoke hoods can become damaged by being carried around in a purse or briefcase for too many years. Food can become stale and inedible. Medications can expire. Children can grow and require different sizes of clothing.

Finally, while having a contingency plan on paper is better than having nothing, those plans that are tested in the real world prove to be far superior to plans that are never tested. Running through an evacuation plan (especially during a high-traffic time such as rush hour) will help to identify weaknesses that will not appear on paper. It also will help ensure that all those involved know what they are supposed to do and where they are supposed to go. A plan is of limited use if half of the people it is designed for do not understand their respective roles and responsibilities.

No plan is perfect, and chances are that individuals will find themselves “shifting on the fly” as conditions on the ground change in the event of an actual emergency. However, having a plan and being prepared allows a person to be more focused and less panicked and confused than those who have left their fate to chance.

"Taming Chaos with a Personal Plan is republished with permission of STRATFOR."

*  *  *  *

Charles M. Grist
http://www.mylastwar.com/